Thursday, July 27, 2017

Charter Schools / Voucher Programs

I might be starting to repeat myself. The last two posts cover the territory I am dealing with here (misplaced trust in the free market, as guided by bad populist ideology), but charter schools and voucher programs seem to represent the end-stage of the process. Au (2014) describes the linkage between testing, assessment, and school reform under neoliberalism as follows: "Bad businesses (schools) will go out of business (be closed) because their products (students) do not pass inspection (high stakes testing). To replace bad businesses (closed schools), entrepreneurs (charter management organizations) will be encouraged to open new businesses (charter schools) free of public regulation and public oversight" (p.145). In my first blog, I mentioned that the school reform movement seemed so transparently sinister that it made me feel like a conspiracy theorist, but the linkage still seems pretty clear to me.

As we discussed in class, the specific effectiveness of both charter schools and voucher programs seems besides the point. They are certainly utilitarian, and are more or less effective (depending on the specific context of the school, students, and district). They fail, though, because they use an inappropriate capitalistic model that is inappropriate for education. Ravitch (2013) cites John Merrow, who asks "why America- which had pioneered the mass-produced automobile with the Ford Model T- had not been able to mass-produce high quality schools" (p.174). The answer seems obvious: regions are different, schools are different, and children are different. Attempts to mass-produce education will never yield quality education so long as these things are true.

I am leaving aside the shady business practices, conflicts of interest, ethical violations, etc. that tend to follow charter schools and voucher programs, because I want to emphasize that even if those issues disappeared, and we could somehow trust boards of directors to be moral, privatizing education is bad for students, teachers, and communities.

References

Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America's public schools. Vintage.

Gorski, Paul C., and Kristien Zenkov, eds. The big lies of school reform: Finding better solutions for the future of public education. Routledge, 2014.

1 comment:

  1. I am really glad you pulled that quote from the Ravtich book because I feel like it totally sums up the whole argument for privatizing education.

    So many of these people who push for charter schools and vouchers seem to think that education can be ran like a business, but like we talked about last week, education in the United States does not have the ability to turn away the "defective parts" the way an assembly line can. It seems even more far fetched that these reformers think privatizing education is the answer. However, if you follow this capitalistic line of thinking, I guess that is the answer since you do have the ability to turn away the parts that do not work.

    I think our best solution is to help people understand that every student is different and by extension there is no one type of reform fix all strategy that will work. Different schools in different regions need different types and levels of support.

    ReplyDelete

teacher's unions

The popularity of the narrative that unions are bad for jobs, bad for business, and bad for taxpayers is one of the best tricks the right ...